Header graphic for print
LimeGreenIP News

Tag Archives: Claim construction

Join Us at the Annual Berkeley-Stanford Advanced Patent Law Institute

Partner, Chris Mammen will be speaking at the the Advanced Patent Law Institute in Palo Alto on Dec 6-7, 2018. The APLI offers a results-oriented, in-depth look at the latest developments in patent law and practice. Co-organized by BCLT and Stanford Law School, it presents an expert faculty of judges, academics, litigators, patent prosecutors, and senior IP counsel from major corporations. Chris

China: Are you up-to-date on SPC draft guidelines on patent examination and administrative cases concerning patent rights?

China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) recently circulated its Draft “Provisions on Several Issues concerning the Adjudication of Administrative Cases on Granting and Affirming Patent Rights (I)” (最高人民法院关于审理专利授权确权行政案件若干问题的规定(一)). This Draft aims to address issues concerning administrative court adjudication and Patent Review Board (“PRB”) decisions regarding both patent examination and patent validity. The Provisions apply to: patent grant

U.S. + Germany Patent Update – July 2018

The U.S. and Germany are two of the most key fora in the world for patent litigation. The U.S. has long been one of the largest markets for patent litigation, and Germany has constantly attracted more than 50% of all European patent litigation. Hogan Lovells offers its multi-lingual update, dated July 2018, on notable recent

U.S. – Federal Circuit revamps “means-plus-function” trigger

An en banc Federal Circuit issued an opinion on 16 June 2015 weakening a longstanding claim construction presumption related to what patent practitioners know as “means-plus-function” language  under pre-America Invents Act (AIA) 35 U.S.C. § 112, para. 6 or AIA 35 U.S.C. § 112(f). This significant shift by the court will impact functional claiming, or

U.S. – Claim construction at the PTAB is under review

Claim construction is at the heart of nearly every patent litigation and the new post-grant procedures at the U.S.P.T.O. are no different.  The claim construction standard used by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) at the PTO during an inter partes review (“IPR”) is currently being challenged before the United States Court of Appeals