Partner, Chris Mammen will be speaking at the the Advanced Patent Law Institute in Palo Alto on Dec 6-7, 2018. The APLI offers a results-oriented, in-depth look at the latest developments in patent law and practice. Co-organized by BCLT and Stanford Law School, it presents an expert faculty of judges, academics, litigators, patent prosecutors, and senior IP counsel from major corporations. Chris
As part of the Practising Law Institute’s (PLI) Patent Litigation 2018: Advanced Techniques & Best Practices program on November 14/15, Partner Eric Lobenfeld will be speaking on the following topic: Choosing the Right Expert and Demonstration of Expert Testimony Expert witnesses play a critical role in patent litigation with respect to both liability and damages issues.
The Beijing IP Court recently made headlines by granting a record amount of damages for patent infringement -no less than RMB 49 million (USD7.15m)-, one of the highest amounts since the court was established in November 2014. Moreover, the Court also granted the Plaintiff’s demand for a reimbursement of no less than RMB 1 million
The Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt recently ruled on the territorial scope of cease and desist claims and the law applicable to damages claims in a case where infringing acts occurred in several EU Member States (Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt, case ref. 6 U 4/15). Generally, the EU trademark regulation provides unitary protection of
On 23 June 2016, the Guangdong Higher People’s Court handed down its long-awaited judgment in the New Balance/新百伦-case. In its judgment, the Court upheld the finding of trademark infringement by New Balance, but reduced the damages granted in first instance from RMB 98 million by nearly twenty-fold, to ‘only’ RMB 5 million (approximately USD 750,000).
On 13 June 2016, the English Court of Appeal handed down its latest judgement in the long-running trade secrets case Vestergaard Frandsen (now MVF3 ApS) and others v Bestnet Europe and others. The Court held that where the misuse of confidential information had been a basis for developing a derived product which did not itself
The Supreme People’s Court (“SPC”) has recently issued a new judicial interpretation on patent disputes (“JI”). In this new JI, the SPC seeks to streamline its former JI with the Patent Law, and tweak some patent litigation rules. The SPC’s new JI – which came into effect on February 1, 2015 – replaces the former